Perl 6 RSS Feeds
Steve Mynott (Freenode: stmuk) steve.mynott (at)gmail.com / 2016-08-31T08:21:19An FPL budget split is the plan for dividing Fantasy Premier League's £100.0m between goalkeepers, defenders, midfielders and forwards before any individual player is chosen. Setting the split first keeps the squad balanced and leaves room to react. Fixtures, lineups and player data on RubiScore supply the evidence behind each allocation.
This how-to sets out an eight-step method for 2026/27, built on the official squad and scoring rules, then two hypothetical splits, common mistakes and a checklist. Fixtures, lineups and player pages listing minutes, goals, assists, cards and club history are available at https://rubiscore.com for checking the players in each price band.
The method rests on these fixed 2026/27 rules:
At launch, the cheapest goalkeepers and defenders cost £4.0m and the cheapest midfielders and forwards £4.5m. The ceilings were far apart: £6.0m for the most expensive goalkeeper, £8.0m for a defender, £12.0m for a midfielder and £15.5m for a forward. A squad built entirely from the cheapest players would have cost £64.0m, so the real decision is where to place the other £36.0m.
The four substitutes score only through automatic substitutions or a Bench Boost, so money spent there is missing from the XI. The choice is between a non-playing bench of the cheapest players and a playing bench of cheap regular starters who can cover absences.
At launch prices, the cheapest bench behind a 3-4-3 or 3-5-2 cost £16.5m: a goalkeeper and two defenders at £4.0m, plus a £4.5m midfielder or forward. A playing bench usually costs more, because the cheapest players are often backups. Fixing a bench figure first, for example between £16.5m and £20.0m, leaves roughly £80.0m to £83.5m for the starting XI.
The official 2026/27 scoring table rewards the four positions differently. Every player earns one point for appearing, two for playing 60 minutes or more, three per assist and up to three bonus points. The differences are:
The pattern is a cap on defensive points and none on attacking points. A defender collects at most four for a clean sheet and two for defensive contributions in a match, while goals and assists keep adding up. Clean sheets also depend on the whole team, so a cheaper defender from a solid defence can earn much of what a premium one does. Attacking returns depend more on the individual.
Captaincy concentrates points. Because the captain's score is doubled, the player captained most weeks has an outsized effect on the season total, and the most dependable options are usually high-volume attackers capable of double-figure scores. The first premium purchase should therefore be the expected regular captain, and the second a credible alternative for weeks when the first is unavailable or faces a difficult fixture.
Beyond those, extra money tends to buy less, because each further premium usually means a weaker bench or more starters near the floor. Picking the weekly captain is a separate decision; this step only funds the candidates.
Goalkeeper points cluster in a narrow range, so many splits keep both goalkeepers near the floor, provided the first choice actually starts.
Defenders need more thought since defensive contribution points arrived in 2025/26, a rule retained for 2026/27. A centre-back who regularly reaches 10 defensive actions adds two points even without a clean sheet, which makes some cheaper defenders steadier than their price suggests. Every defender from the promoted clubs was priced at £4.0m for 2026/27, widening the pool at the floor. A common structure is one or two defenders from the strongest defences plus budget picks who start every week.
A midfielder earns five points per goal and one for a clean sheet, while a forward earns four and none, so a midfielder who scores as often as a forward outscores him. Against that, the most prolific forwards tend to get more shots in the box, and at launch the most expensive forward cost £3.5m more than the most expensive midfielder.
Formation links the two. One premium forward and two cheap ones points towards 3-5-2 or 4-4-2 with a forward on the bench; two or three well-funded forwards point towards 3-4-3 and fewer expensive midfielders. Either can work, but the shape should follow the money.
A price only turns into points if the player is on the pitch, so check two things for each candidate:
On RubiScore, player pages list minutes, goals, assists and cards alongside club history, while fixtures and lineups show who started recently and what lies ahead. A cheap player with secure minutes is worth more to a split than a slightly cheaper one who rarely plays.
Leaving a small sum unspent, for example £0.5m to £1.5m, allows one-transfer upgrades and cushions price movements, which matter because a seller keeps only half of any rise. The Scout's official FPL guidance for 2026/27 also recommends price points: players placed at levels from which one transfer can reach most alternatives avoid extra transfers at four points each.
An opening split is a hypothesis. After four to six Gameweeks, compare each position's points with the money spent on it, and check whether premiums are returning and budget starters still start. The Scout suggests planning around the first five Gameweeks and banking free transfers, which can leave five to reshape the split. Larger rebalances usually wait for a Wildcard, available once in each half of the season.
The two allocations below are hypothetical and purely illustrative. They do not use real player prices and only show how the same £100.0m can be shaped.
Played as 3-4-3, the bench costs £17.5m and includes a £5.0m defender who can start in good fixtures. Nine starters cost £6.0m or more, so returns are spread widely, but nobody approaches the top price bands, which limits the captaincy ceiling.
Four players costing £11.0m or more absorb £48.5m, almost half the budget. In a 3-4-3 the bench costs £16.5m, the minimum possible, and two £4.5m outfield players start. The captaincy ceiling is higher, but an injury to a cheap starter leaves little cover and little money to fix it.
Neither split is correct in general. Split A suits managers who want consistency and fewer forced transfers; Split B suits those who accept more risk for higher weekly ceilings.
A budget split is not a fixed formula. It is a decision about where the scoring rules reward money most, adjusted as minutes, fixtures and form change.